On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:51 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Linus, > > > That "individual patches" is one of the keywords, btw. One thing that BK > > has been extremely good at, and that a lot of people have come to like > > even when they didn't use BK, is how we've been maintaining a much finer- > > granularity view of changes. That isn't going to go away. > > Are you happy with processing patches + descriptions, one per mail? > Do you have it automated to the point where processing emailed patches > involves little more overhead than doing a bk pull? If so, then your > mailbox (or patch queue) becomes a natural serialization point for the > changes, and the need for a tool that can handle a complex graph of > changes is much reduced.
alternatively you could send an mbox with your series in... that has a natural sequence in it ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
