Em Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:07:08PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> (2014/11/05 15:50), Hemant Kumar wrote:
> >> And also, user interface is a discussion point. This series defines new
> >> sdt-cache command, and we already have buildid-cache command. We should
> >> have probe-cache command too? or consolidate those cache managing
> >> commands?
> >> This question should be involving your series too.
> > I think, we need not have multiple sub-commands to manage the cache. We
> > can consolidate the cache management of probe events (including SDT
> > events) to a single command.
> Agreed. maybe perf-cache --buildid/--sdt/--probe would be good.
We have it already, its called 'perf buildid-cache':
[root@zoo ~]# perf buildid-cache --hell
Error: unknown option `hell'
usage: perf buildid-cache [<options>]
-a, --add <file list>
file(s) to add
-k, --kcore <file> kcore file to add
-r, --remove <file list>
file(s) to remove
-M, --missing <file> to find missing build ids in the cache
-f, --force don't complain, do it
-u, --update <file list>
file(s) to update
-v, --verbose be more verbose
[root@zoo ~]#
We can rename it at some point to 'perf cache', perhaps.
'perf cache --buildid' makes no sense, everything is keyed by build-id
(hence the name, which is albeit long, admit), I guess what you meant
was 'elf'.
It currently stores content of the form:
- ELF
- kcore (which is also ELF, but has no pathname)
- kallsyms
We would be adding other types of content, from this discussion:
- sdt
- [ku]probes (built from some other content, like ELF or kallsyms)
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
