On Tuesday 05 April 2005 21:00, Jörn Engel wrote: > On Tue, 5 April 2005 17:26:31 +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: > > > > Would this be a good thing to clean up, or isn't it worth the effort at all? > > I would welcome such a stream of patches. But in spite of the calloc > interface being rather stupid, I'd prefer to see patches with kcalloc > instead of kmalloc_zero.
kcalloc call will have three params pushed on stack. in 99% of cases it could be done with two. If anyone's going to do it, please create and use void *kzalloc(size, gfp_mask) or zalloc, kmalloc_zero... whatever. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
