On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:56:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Odd. Yes, it is odd...
> > 2.6.11-bk9 works (actually it takes under 2 seconds, not 5-10). > > 2.6.11-bk10 has the weird slowdown. > > Unfortunately that's a pretty bug diff (2 megs). Yeah, I know. *sigh* [snip] > but you'd be getting a printk storm if that was triggering. I'm not seeing a printk storm, at least, none that I can discern... > > I'll see if I can isolate it any further. > > Please, that would help. I'm working on it right now. 2.6.11 + linus.patch from 2.6.11-mm3 works. 2.6.11 + approx. 292 patches from 2.6.11-mm3 is broken. 2.6.11 + approx. 130 patches (a proper subset of the 292 patches) works. (this is counting each subsystem bk tree as a single patch) The diff between the latter two trees is still larger than the 2.6.11-bk9 -> -bk10 diff, but after one or two more iterations of (psuedo-)binary search, it should be much smaller. I'm planning to go as far as I can before going to bed tonight. -Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
