On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> TLB flushing is only me I think, I'll engage my brain after breakfast
> and see if is all good
Ping? Breakfast is either long over, of you're starting to look a bit
like Mr Creosote...
Anyway, Will, I assume this is not a correctness issue for you, just
an annoying performance issue. Right? Or is there actually some issue
with the actual range not being set to be sufficiently large?
Also, it strikes me that I *think* that you might be able to extend
your patch to remove the whole "need_flush" field, since as far as I
can tell, "tlb->need_flush" is now equivalent to "tlb->start <
tlb->end". Of course, as long as we still require that
"need_flush_all", that doesn't actually save us any space, so maybe
it's not worth changing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
