-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
We should merge this backport - it's needed to prevent deadlocks when
dio_complete() does up_read() from IRQ context. And perhaps other places.
From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[PATCH] rwsem: Make rwsems use interrupt disabling spinlocks
The attached patch makes read/write semaphores use interrupt disabling
spinlocks in the slow path, thus rendering the up functions and trylock
functions available for use in interrupt context. This matches the
regular semaphore behaviour.
I've assumed that the normal down functions must be called with interrupts
enabled (since they might schedule), and used the irq-disabling spinlock
variants that don't save the flags.
Signed-Off-By: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tested-by: Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
--- a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c 2005-04-01 23:22:40 -08:00
+++ b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c 2005-04-01 23:22:40 -08:00
@@ -140,12 +140,12 @@
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_read");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
sem->activity++;
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
goto out;
}
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
/* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
@@ -181,10 +181,12 @@
*/
int fastcall __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_read_trylock");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
@@ -192,7 +194,7 @@
ret = 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __down_read_trylock");
return ret;
@@ -209,12 +211,12 @@
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_write");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (sem->activity == 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
sem->activity = -1;
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
goto out;
}
@@ -229,7 +231,7 @@
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
/* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
@@ -250,10 +252,12 @@
*/
int fastcall __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_write_trylock");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
if (sem->activity == 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
@@ -261,7 +265,7 @@
ret = 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __down_write_trylock");
return ret;
@@ -272,14 +276,16 @@
*/
void fastcall __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __up_read");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
if (--sem->activity == 0 && !list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_wake_one_writer(sem);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __up_read");
}
@@ -289,15 +295,17 @@
*/
void fastcall __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __up_write");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
sem->activity = 0;
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __up_write");
}
@@ -308,15 +316,17 @@
*/
void fastcall __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __downgrade_write");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
sem->activity = 1;
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __downgrade_write");
}
diff -Nru a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
--- a/lib/rwsem.c 2005-04-01 23:22:40 -08:00
+++ b/lib/rwsem.c 2005-04-01 23:22:40 -08:00
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
waiter->task = tsk;
get_task_struct(tsk);
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
if (!(count & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
@@ -219,15 +219,17 @@
*/
struct rw_semaphore fastcall *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering rwsem_wake");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
/* do nothing if list empty */
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving rwsem_wake");
@@ -241,15 +243,17 @@
*/
struct rw_semaphore fastcall *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering rwsem_downgrade_wake");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
/* do nothing if list empty */
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving rwsem_downgrade_wake");
return sem;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
