Hi,
On 10/30/2014 01:48 AM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> A default dma_alloc_coherent() fails to alloc a coherent memory on
> non-coherent
> systems in case of device->coherent_dma_mask covering the whole memory space.
>
> In case of non-coherent systems the coherent memory on MIPS is restricted by
> size of un-cachable segment and should be located in ZONE_DMA.
>
> Added __GFP_DMA flag in case of non-coherent systems to enforce an allocation
> of coherent memory in ZONE_DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <leonid.yegos...@imgtec.com>
> ---
> .../include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/dma-coherence.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/dma-coherence.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/dma-coherence.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jazz/dma-coherence.h | 2 +-
> .../mips/include/asm/mach-loongson/dma-coherence.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
> b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
> index f9f4486..fe0b465 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline int plat_dma_supported(struct device *dev,
> u64 mask)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> +static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(const struct device *dev)
Why adding const here?
> {
> return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/dma-coherence.h
> b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/dma-coherence.h
> index b4563df..2283996 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/dma-coherence.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/dma-coherence.h
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline int plat_dma_supported(struct device *dev,
> u64 mask)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> +static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(const struct device *dev)
likewise
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_COHERENT
> return 1;
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/dma-coherence.h
> b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/dma-coherence.h
> index 4ffddfd..c7767e3 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/dma-coherence.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/dma-coherence.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline int plat_dma_supported(struct device *dev,
> u64 mask)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> +static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(const struct device *dev)
likewise
> {
> return 1; /* IP27 non-cohernet mode is unsupported */
> }
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/dma-coherence.h
> b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/dma-coherence.h
> index 104cfbc..a6b6a55 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/dma-coherence.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/dma-coherence.h
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline int plat_dma_supported(struct device *dev,
> u64 mask)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> +static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(const struct device *dev)
likewise etc
Is it just a matter of consistence with the rest of the interfaces? Do
you need to move these into a separate patch since they don't quite fit
here.
--
markos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
