On 10/28/2014 03:01 AM, Len Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote:
In the current code, the check to reflect or not the outcoming state is done
against the idle state which has been chosen and its value.

Instead of doing a check in each of the reflect functions, just don't call 
reflect
if something went wrong in the idle path.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org>
---
  drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 3 +--
  drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c   | 4 +---
  kernel/sched/idle.c                | 3 ++-
  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c 
b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
index fb396d6..c0b36a8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
@@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ static int ladder_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
  static void ladder_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
  {
         struct ladder_device *ldev = &__get_cpu_var(ladder_devices);
-       if (index > 0)
-               ldev->last_state_idx = index;

Before this patch, last_state_idx was never set to 0 here.
After this patch, last_state_idx will be set to 0 when entered_state is 0.
Is that okay?

Yes, I think so because the state zero won't be never selected on x86 but on the other arch it will. So before this patch, on the other archs, the state 0 was never reflected as it should do.

This is resulting from the CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START macro (I hope I can kill this macro in a couple of patchset after this one).

+       ldev->last_state_idx = index;
  }

  static struct cpuidle_governor ladder_governor = {
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index a17515f..3907301 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -365,9 +365,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct 
cpuidle_device *dev,
  static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
  {
         struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
-       data->last_state_idx = index;
-       if (index >= 0)
-               data->needs_update = 1;
+       data->needs_update = 1;
  }

  /**
diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
index 58c7522..49dcc7d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ use_default:
         /*
          * Give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome
          */
-       cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);
+       if (entered_state >= 0)
+               cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);

  exit_idle:
         __current_set_polling();
--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html





--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to