irq_set_irq_wake() treats its second argument as a boolean. It is much
easier to read code when constant booleans are either 0 or 1!

This particular line of code distracted me somewhat when I was doing a bit of
work in a code browser since it (spuriously) got me worried that I had
misunderstood how irq_set_irq_wake() worked.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c
index 73b7396..997e61e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int gpio_msm_v1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        irq_set_chained_handler(irq1, msm_gpio_irq_handler);
        irq_set_chained_handler(irq2, msm_gpio_irq_handler);
        irq_set_irq_wake(irq1, 1);
-       irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 2);
+       irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 1);
        return 0;
 }

--
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to