On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Octavian Purdila <[email protected]> wrote: > Some GPIO chips (e.g. the DLN2 USB adapter) have blocking get/set > operation but do not need a threaded irq handler.
Sorry if you already explained this (I have been a little bit late with the GPIO reviews recently), but does this optimization bring a significant benefit that justifies adding another field in struct gpio_chip? If so it would be nice to have it in the commit message. If not, do we need this at all? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
