On Sunday, October 12, 2014 12:35:22 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/12/2014 12:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, October 11, 2014 02:14:16 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> The syscore shutdown callback seems to be perfectly suited to prepare for > >> system > >> poweroff. Use it instead of pm_power_off_prepare. > > > > How much testing did that receive? > > > > As I mentioned in patch 0/2, compile tested so far only. Before I start > playing > with my servers, I wanted to get some feedback if the idea is worth pursuing > further or if I am missing something essential.
Well, it makes sense in principle, but the ordering with respect to the other syscore shutdown things and the migrate_to_reboot_cpu() may be a problem. I always get nervous when the ordering of ACPI-related code changes like that and the reason is quite weak this time to be honest. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
