Because IIO_EV_DIR_* are not bitmasks but enums,
IIO_EV_DIR_RISING | IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING is not equal
with IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER.

This could lead to potential misformatted sysfs attributes
like:
        * in_accel_x_thresh_(null)_en
        * in_accel_x_thresh_(null)_period
        * in_accel_x_thresh_(null)_value

or even memory corruption.

Fixes: b4b491c083 (iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Support threshold)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.bal...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index 98909a9..a23e58c 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group kxcjk1013_attrs_group = 
{
 
 static const struct iio_event_spec kxcjk1013_event = {
                .type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
-               .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING | IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING,
+               .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER,
                .mask_separate = BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE) |
                                 BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_ENABLE) |
                                 BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_PERIOD)
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to