On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:38:53PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 10/08/2014 04:25 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That doesn't mean that the definition of those modes is something we can > > sensibly provide in generic code, especially in a completely > > undocumented fashion (perhaps you've done that later in the patch series > > but bisection also applies to reviewability). > As a general question, now that the convention is for DT binding docs to go > in a separate patch, should the DT documentation be added before or after > that code using these bindings is added? It fairly obviously needs to go before so that reviewers can tell if the code is actually implementing the binding.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
