On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:40:13PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > Both of the file target's calls to vfs_fsync_range() got the end offset > off by one. The range is inclusive, not exclusive. It would sync a bit > more data than was required. > > The sync path already tested the length of the range and fell back to > LLONG_MAX so I copied that pattern in the rw path. > > This is untested. I found the errors by inspection while following other > code.
Maybe it's time to move vfs_fsync_range to a more normal calling convention? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
