Guillaume wrote:
> The goal of the fork connector is to inform a user space application
> that a fork occurs in the kernel. This information (cpu ID, parent PID
> and child PID) can be used by several user space applications. It's not
> only for accounting. Accounting and fork_connector are two different
> things and thus, fork_connector doesn't do the merge of any kinds of
> data (and it will never do).
Yes - it is clear that the fork_connector does this - inform user space
of fork information <cpu, parent, child>. I'm not saying that
fork_connector should merge data; I'm observing that it doesn't, and
that this would seem to serve the needs of accounting poorly.
Out of curiosity, what are these 'several user space applications?' The
only one I know of is this extension to bsd accounting to include
capturing parent and child pid at fork. Probably you've mentioned some
other uses of fork_connector before here, but I missed it.
> The relayfs is done, like Evgeniy said, for large amount of
> datas. So I think that it's not suitable for what we want to achieve
> with the fork connector.
I never claimed that relayfs was appropriate for fork_connector.
I'm not trying to tape a rock to Evgeniy's screwdriver. I'm saying that
accounting looks like a nail to me, so let us see what rocks and hammers
we have in our tool box.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.650.933.1373,
1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
