On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:23:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > - int old=card->amplifier; > > > + int old; > > > if(!card) > > > { > > > CS_DBGOUT(CS_ERROR, 2, printk(KERN_INFO > > > "cs46xx: amp_hercules() called before > > initialized.\n")); > > > return; > > > } > > > + old = card->amplifier;
> No, there is a third case: the pointer can be NULL, but the compiler > happened to move the dereference down to after the check. > > If the optimiser is later changed, or if someone tries to compile the code > with -O0, it will oops. The thing GCC is most likely to do with this code is discard the NULL check entirely and leave only the oops; the "if (!card)" can not be reached without passing through "card->amplifier", and a pointer which is dereferenced can not be NULL in a valid program. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/