On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:44:47PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> Adding parentheses around expression to avoid:
> drivers/acpi/sbs.c:444:28: warning: dubious: !x & y
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <f...@skynet.be>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sbs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sbs.c b/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
> index 32aecea..a7a3edd 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
> @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int acpi_ac_get_present(struct acpi_sbs *sbs)
>        * The spec requires that bit 4 always be 1. If it's not set, assume
>        * that the implementation doesn't support an SBS charger
>        */
> -     if (!(status >> 4) & 0x1)
> +     if (!((status >> 4) & 0x1))

i think the logic changed over here.
it was !x & y , but now it has become !(x & y)
! is having higher priority than & so !x & y will mean ((!x) & y)

thanks
sudip
>               return -ENODEV;
>  
>       sbs->charger_present = (status >> 15) & 0x1;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to