On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:09:54PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mär 2005, Alan Cox wrote: > > I pushed the tested one as a starting point. May have been the wrong > > decision but it's my fault if so > > Ah ok. I checked the differences between the versions but there are too > many `none-standard' changes, i.e. kernel-language changes (statics, > inlines, __) etc so that I cannot submit a patch for the new version. > > The good thing about the one on Luc's page it that it includes sysfs > support for several parameters and some more device ids.
Sorry, i was in holliday far far away from my computer (it's very rare). I can produce a patch with coding style fixes, or wait to fix a bug in v4l2 then submit the patch. What do you prefer ? Some applications crashes when using the v4l2 API. I can made v4l2 optional. I know that a lot of changes needs to be applied to the driver to please everybody. So perhaps i can try to begin with a patch (with v4l2), and wait for feedback, and resend patch until this is correct ? Luc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
