On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 09:11 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > Many embedded systems will not need these syscalls, and omitting them > saves space. Add a new EXPERT config option CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS > (default y) to support compiling them out.
general question: if a user chooses CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS=n (or any config option related to tinyfication) and breaks the system/workload... will that be acceptable for a kernel pov? In other words, what's the degree of responsibility the user will have when choosing such builds? Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
