Am 19.09.2014 17:37, schrieb Jeff Kirsher:
> On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 17:35 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 19.09.2014 17:29, schrieb Jeff Kirsher:
>>> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Silence nested-externs warnings for these, as these nested
>>> externs are truly wanted.
>>>
>>> CC: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
>>> CC: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>>> CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
>>> CC: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
>>> CC: Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/signal.h | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h
>>> index 750196f..e68ae6b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/signal.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/signal.h
>>> @@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ static inline int sigismember(sigset_t *set, int _sig)
>>>
>>> static inline int sigisemptyset(sigset_t *set)
>>> {
>>> + DIAG_PUSH DIAG_IGNORE(nested-externs)
>>
>> Do we really want to clutter the source with such tags?
>> Does this even build? i.e. how does gcc know to ignore that?
>>
>> rw@azrael:~/linux (ubi-wlcrash $)> git grep DIAG_PUSH | wc -l
>> 0
>>
>> Thanks,
>> //richard
>
> See patch 1 of the series.I was not CC'ed... Thanks, //richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
