Hi Will,

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 05:51:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> [adding devicetree for the last paragraph]
> 
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:52:56AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
> > 
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Okay, so here is the updated patch:

>From b5d895980849ba1a46a5250cd4cc5f3f9f28235d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:49:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 04/13] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert to iommu_capable() API function

Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index a83cc2a..f5cacf4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1526,20 +1526,20 @@ static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_iova_to_phys(struct 
iommu_domain *domain,
        return __pfn_to_phys(pte_pfn(pte)) | (iova & ~PAGE_MASK);
 }
 
-static int arm_smmu_domain_has_cap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
-                                  unsigned long cap)
+static bool arm_smmu_capable(enum iommu_cap cap)
 {
-       struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = domain->priv;
-       struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
-       u32 features = smmu ? smmu->features : 0;
-
        switch (cap) {
        case IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY:
-               return features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK;
+               /*
+                * Return false here until we have a way to find out whether the
+                * SMMUs in the system a coherently connected and able to force
+                * DMA coherency.
+                */
+               return false;
        case IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP:
-               return 1; /* MSIs are just memory writes */
+               return true; /* MSIs are just memory writes */
        default:
-               return 0;
+               return false;
        }
 }
 
@@ -1609,6 +1609,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 }
 
 static const struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
+       .capable        = arm_smmu_capable,
        .domain_init    = arm_smmu_domain_init,
        .domain_destroy = arm_smmu_domain_destroy,
        .attach_dev     = arm_smmu_attach_dev,
@@ -1616,7 +1617,6 @@ static const struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
        .map            = arm_smmu_map,
        .unmap          = arm_smmu_unmap,
        .iova_to_phys   = arm_smmu_iova_to_phys,
-       .domain_has_cap = arm_smmu_domain_has_cap,
        .add_device     = arm_smmu_add_device,
        .remove_device  = arm_smmu_remove_device,
        .pgsize_bitmap  = (SECTION_SIZE |
-- 
1.8.4.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to