On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:19:55AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Noone will complain on Linux if NIC is broken and produces wrong > checksum > and HW checksum offloading is enabled using ethtools.
This is completely different. The worst that can happen with checksum offloading is that the packet is dropped. That's something people deal with on a daily basis since the Internet as a whole does not guarantee the delivery of packets. On the other hand, /dev/random is something that has always promised to deliver random numbers that are totally unpredictable. People out there *depend* on this. If that assumption is violated the result could be catastrophic. That's why it's OK to have hardware RNG spit out unverified numbers in /dev/hw_random, but it's absolutely unaccpetable for the same numbers to add entropy to /dev/random without verification. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
