* Stephen C. Tweedie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:39, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Actually the patch you atached showed in the end as not covering all > > the cases and so Stephen agreed to stay with the first try (attached) > > which should cover all known cases (although it's not so nice). > > Right. The later patch is getting reworked into a proper locking > overhaul for the journal_put_journal_head() code. The earlier one (that > Jan attached) is the one that's appropriate in the mean time; it covers > all of the holes we know about for sure and has proven robust in > testing.
OK, good to know. When I last checked you were working on a higher risk yet more complete fix, and I thought we'd wait for that one to stabilize. Looks like the one Jan attached is the better -stable candidate? thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
