On ARM64, when the BPF JIT compiler fills the JIT image body with
opcodes during translation of eBPF into ARM64 opcodes, we may fail
for several reasons during that phase: one being that we jump to
the notyet label for not yet supported eBPF instructions such as
BPF_ST. In that case we only free offsets, but not the actual
allocated target image where opcodes are being stored. Fix it by
calling module_free() on dismantle time in case of errors.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dbork...@redhat.com>
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim....@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
---
[ Compile-tested only. ]
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 38c4296..7ae3354 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -651,8 +651,10 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
build_prologue(&ctx);
ctx.body_offset = ctx.idx;
- if (build_body(&ctx))
+ if (build_body(&ctx)) {
+ module_free(NULL, ctx.image);
goto out;
+ }
build_epilogue(&ctx);
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
