Jeff Garzik wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
David McCullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is a small patch for 2.6.11 that adds a routine:
add_true_randomness(__u32 *buf, int nwords);
It neither applies correctly nor compiles in current kernels. 2.6.11 is
very old in kernel time.
Hrm. This is getting pretty lame, if you can't take patches from the
-latest- stable release. It's pretty easy in BK:
bk clone -ql -rv2.6.11 linux-2.6 rng-2.6.11
cd rng-2.6.11
{ apply patch }
bk pull ../linux-2.6
Can you set up something like that?
I thought that the latest stable release was 2.6.11.5.
However, what I really want to do is ask what patches should be
made against. I suggested on linux-scsi a day or 2 ago that
they should be made against the latest linus-bk (or snapshot)
unless the patch only applies to -mm, then they should obviously
be made against -mm. 2.6.11 plain is relatively aged IMO also....
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
