On 09/04/2014 04:53 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/09/14 15:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.09.14 at 14:52, <david.vra...@citrix.com> wrote:
On 04/09/14 13:38, Juergen Gross wrote:
--- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S
@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ NEXT_HYPERCALL(arch_6)
ELFNOTE(Xen, XEN_ELFNOTE_L1_MFN_VALID,
.quad _PAGE_PRESENT; .quad _PAGE_PRESENT)
ELFNOTE(Xen, XEN_ELFNOTE_SUSPEND_CANCEL, .long 1)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ ELFNOTE(Xen, XEN_ELFNOTE_MOD_START_PFN, .long 1)
+#endif
Why X86_64 only? If there's a good reason the commit message needs to
explain why.
Does native 32-bit support huge initrd?
Does that matter? If the MOD_START_PFN options works with a 32-bit guest
then it should use it, regardless of whether it is essential or not.
Because this reduces the #ifdef'ery.
Okay, I'll verify it's working on 32-bit, too.
Juergen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
