* Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i think the 'migrate read-count' method is not adequate either, because
> > all callbacks queued within an RCU read section must be called after the
> > lock has been dropped - while with the migration method CPU#1 would be
> > free to process callbacks queued in the RCU read section still active on
> > CPU#2.
>
> how about keeping the rcu callback list in process context and only
> splice it to a global (per cpu) list on rcu_read_unlock?
hm, that would indeed solve this problem. It would also solve the grace
period problem: all callbacks in the global (per-CPU) list are
immediately processable. Paul?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
