On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 01:04:13PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > OK, if the question is about other users, should we review all current users > that do not specify that gpio, change them to pass -1 and then allow valid > GPIO#0 as a valid ena_gpio? What do you think about a patch > that will warn for one or two releases that ena_gpio == 0 will change > meaning in a forthcoming feature?
The warning is sensible (I'm sure we used to have one though I can't see it in the git logs now) but I'm not sure a two release cycle is enough for everyone to have upgraded and paid attention.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
