On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:30:06AM +0100, byungchul.p...@lge.com wrote: > From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com> > > This reverts commit 601c942176d8ad8334118bddb747e3720bed24f8. > > This patch is designed to ensure that the cpu being offlined is not > present in the affinity mask. But it is a bad idea to overwrite the > affinity variable with cpu_online_mask, even in case that the current > affinity already includes onlined cpus. > > So revert this patch to replace it with another one doing exactly > what it intends.
Sudeep: what's the right way forward for this? There seems to be general agreement that the existing code is broken, but a bunch of different `fixes'. Can we just take a straight port of what tglx proposed for ARM? (changing force to false) Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
