After the for_each_matching_node loop, we end up with a null value for np. Then, of_match_node() is not matching anything and we can't register the standby function and "ramc no standby function available" is printed.
Fix that by selecting the first available standby function. For now, at91_pm_set_standby doesn't support multiple different standby functions and no existing SoCs have different RAM controllers. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c index 28ae63b8eb16..d2cade21ebd7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c @@ -343,25 +343,28 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void) struct device_node *np; const struct of_device_id *of_id; int idx = 0; + const void *standby = NULL; - for_each_matching_node(np, ramc_ids) { + for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, ramc_ids, &of_id) { at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0); if (!at91_ramc_base[idx]) panic(pr_fmt("unable to map ramc[%d] cpu registers\n"), idx); + if (!standby) + standby = of_id->data; + idx++; } if (!idx) panic(pr_fmt("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n")); - of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np); - if (!of_id) { + if (!standby) { pr_warn("ramc no standby function available\n"); return; } - at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data); + at91_pm_set_standby(standby); } void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void) -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
