Pavel Machek wrote:
i do not know if i act like a troll - i think a troll is something totally different.Hi!
[I'm not sure if I should further feed the trolls.]
Yes, it *is* rather unfair. Sorry about that. But having 2 different
limited compressed filesystems in kernel does not seem good to me.
what do you need e.g. reiserfs 4 for? or jfs? or xfs? does not ext2/3 the journalling job also?
is there really a need for cifs and samba and ncpfs and nfs v3 and nfs v4? why?
Take a look at debate that preceded xfs merge. And btw reiserfs4 is *not* merged.
And people merging xfs/reiserfs4/etc did address problems pointed out
in their code.
Pavel
yes of course i know xfs or e.g. the kernel version named debate. but - seriously - is it worth spending
so many time to discuss instead of just fixing the code meanwhile?
that is the main problem also in some other open source projects.
discussing instead of developing - not really efficient.
ps. FYI no, i am not a troll, and i am also taking part in some open source projects contributing code.
regards marcel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
