From: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>

Delete successive assignments to the same location.  In each case, the
duplicated assignment is modified to be in line with other nearby code.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression i;
@@

*i = ...;
 i = ...;
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>

---
The patches in this series do not depend on each other.

Not compiled.  This patch changes the semantics of the code.

 arch/mips/bcm63xx/irq.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/bcm63xx/irq.c b/arch/mips/bcm63xx/irq.c
index 37eb2d1..b94bf44 100644
--- a/arch/mips/bcm63xx/irq.c
+++ b/arch/mips/bcm63xx/irq.c
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static void bcm63xx_init_irq(void)
                irq_stat_addr[0] += PERF_IRQSTAT_3368_REG;
                irq_mask_addr[0] += PERF_IRQMASK_3368_REG;
                irq_stat_addr[1] = 0;
-               irq_stat_addr[1] = 0;
+               irq_mask_addr[1] = 0;
                irq_bits = 32;
                ext_irq_count = 4;
                ext_irq_cfg_reg1 = PERF_EXTIRQ_CFG_REG_3368;
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static void bcm63xx_init_irq(void)
                irq_stat_addr[0] += PERF_IRQSTAT_6328_REG(0);
                irq_mask_addr[0] += PERF_IRQMASK_6328_REG(0);
                irq_stat_addr[1] += PERF_IRQSTAT_6328_REG(1);
-               irq_stat_addr[1] += PERF_IRQMASK_6328_REG(1);
+               irq_mask_addr[1] += PERF_IRQMASK_6328_REG(1);
                irq_bits = 64;
                ext_irq_count = 4;
                is_ext_irq_cascaded = 1;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to