On 21 August 2014 03:53, Chanho Min <chanho....@lge.com> wrote: > It is fully legal for a controller to start handling busy-end interrupt > before it has signaled that the command has completed. So make sure > we do things in the proper order, Or it results that command interrupt > is ignored so it can cause unexpected operations. This is founded at some > toshiba emmc with the bellow warning. > > "mmc0: Got command interrupt 0x00000001 even though > no command operation was in progress." > > This issue has been also reported by Youssef TRIKI: > It is not specific to Toshiba devices, and happens with eMMC devices > as well as SD card which support Auto-CMD12 rather than CMD23. > > Also, similar patch is submitted by: > Gwendal Grignou <gwen...@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Hankyung Yu <hankyung...@lge.com> > Signed-off-by: Chanho Min <chanho....@lge.com> > Tested-by: Youssef TRIKI <youssef.tr...@st.com>
Hi Chanho, This patch has been around for quite some time, sorry for lack of response. Appreciate if we could get this tested on a few more variants of sdhci, I am not able to test myself. I plan to queue this for 3.18, unless someone objects soon. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
