We should only be flushing on close if the file was flagged as needing
it during truncate. I broke this with my ordered data vs transaction
commit deadlock fix.
Thanks to Miao Xie for catching this.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <c...@fb.com>
Reported-by: Miao Xie <mi...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index f15c13f..36861b7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1840,7 +1840,15 @@ int btrfs_release_file(struct inode *inode, struct file
*filp)
{
if (filp->private_data)
btrfs_ioctl_trans_end(filp);
- filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
+ /*
+ * ordered_data_close is set by settattr when we are about to truncate
+ * a file from a non-zero size to a zero size. This tries to
+ * flush down new bytes that may have been written if the
+ * application were using truncate to replace a file in place.
+ */
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORDERED_DATA_CLOSE,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
+ filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
