The uses of "rcu_assign_pointer()" are NULLing out the pointers.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
"1.   This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.

The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@

- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
  (..., NULL)

Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat....@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_qp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_qp.c 
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_qp.c
index 7fcc150..17daf42 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_qp.c
@@ -255,10 +255,10 @@ static void remove_qp(struct qib_ibdev *dev, struct 
qib_qp *qp)
 
        if (rcu_dereference_protected(ibp->qp0,
                        lockdep_is_held(&dev->qpt_lock)) == qp) {
-               rcu_assign_pointer(ibp->qp0, NULL);
+               RCU_INIT_POINTER(ibp->qp0, NULL);
        } else if (rcu_dereference_protected(ibp->qp1,
                        lockdep_is_held(&dev->qpt_lock)) == qp) {
-               rcu_assign_pointer(ibp->qp1, NULL);
+               RCU_INIT_POINTER(ibp->qp1, NULL);
        } else {
                struct qib_qp *q;
                struct qib_qp __rcu **qpp;
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ unsigned qib_free_all_qps(struct qib_devdata *dd)
        for (n = 0; n < dev->qp_table_size; n++) {
                qp = rcu_dereference_protected(dev->qp_table[n],
                        lockdep_is_held(&dev->qpt_lock));
-               rcu_assign_pointer(dev->qp_table[n], NULL);
+               RCU_INIT_POINTER(dev->qp_table[n], NULL);
 
                for (; qp; qp = rcu_dereference_protected(qp->next,
                                        lockdep_is_held(&dev->qpt_lock)))
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to