Since the strlist__add doesn't involves any IO, the failure reason must be ENOMEM or EINVAL, moreover this is just a debug message, we don't need to show the error string.
And also, if get_probe_trace_command_rawlist() returns NULL, it doesn't mean the rawlist is empty, there is an error. So caller must use -ENOMEM for the error. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com> --- tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c index 784ea42..66799c6 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c @@ -1876,7 +1876,7 @@ static struct strlist *get_probe_trace_command_rawlist(int fd) p[idx] = '\0'; ret = strlist__add(sl, buf); if (ret < 0) { - pr_debug("strlist__add failed: %s\n", strerror(-ret)); + pr_debug("strlist__add failed (%d)\n", ret); strlist__delete(sl); return NULL; } @@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static int __show_perf_probe_events(int fd, bool is_kprobe) rawlist = get_probe_trace_command_rawlist(fd); if (!rawlist) - return -ENOENT; + return -ENOMEM; strlist__for_each(ent, rawlist) { ret = parse_probe_trace_command(ent->s, &tev); @@ -2002,6 +2002,8 @@ static struct strlist *get_probe_trace_event_names(int fd, bool include_group) memset(&tev, 0, sizeof(tev)); rawlist = get_probe_trace_command_rawlist(fd); + if (!rawlist) + return NULL; sl = strlist__new(true, NULL); strlist__for_each(ent, rawlist) { ret = parse_probe_trace_command(ent->s, &tev); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/