On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:08:44PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
> > case 2: > > dcs_reg = WM8994_DC_SERVO_4E; > > break; > > - case 1: > > - dcs_reg = WM8994_DC_SERVO_READBACK; > > - break; > > default: > > dcs_reg = WM8993_DC_SERVO_3; > > break; > This doesn't look right, firstly if it is the same register for > all versions then surely we should change the code that sets > dcs_readback_mode rather than setting that to different values > but treating them the same. Although obviously if nothing still > uses this case we could remove it as well. > Also I think the situation is more complex for example on version > 4.4 of the datasheet for wm8994 the WR_VAL fields appear to be in > register 59h. Which is not consistent with this. There was a change in the DC servo between revisions of the WM8994 (at revision E from the look of the code). This isn't documented in the datasheets as they only document current silicon.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature