On Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:44 PM Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >I have difficulties following all of your previous explanations, I must >admit. My point here is I'd like you to find out if the API can fit on >the driver side, and if not, what would need to be changed.
In summary, we agreed that the API you propose should be: int (*error_handler)(struct pci_dev *dev, union error_src *); I believe this API works for most of PCI Express needs. The only addition PCI Express needs is a mechanism for the AER code to request a port bus driver to perform a downstream link reset when an error occurs on that downstream link. For example, you can add the PCIERR_ERROR_PORT_RESET message with the return is either PCIERR_RESULT_RECOVERED or PCIERR_RESULT_DISCONNECT to fit PCI Express needs. Thanks, Long - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
