>>> On 12.08.14 at 11:31, <dvlas...@redhat.com> wrote: > Jan, Pater, does this look correct _and_ human-understandable? > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S > @@ -652,10 +652,14 @@ END(interrupt) > cmovzq PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr),%rsp > CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsi > pushq %rsi > + /* > + * For debugger: > + * "CFA (Current Frame Address) is the value on stack + offset" > + */ > CFI_ESCAPE 0x0f /* DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression */, 6, \ > - 0x77 /* DW_OP_breg7 */, 0, \ > + 0x77 /* DW_OP_breg7 (rsp) */, 0, \
I'm fine with the changes above. > 0x06 /* DW_OP_deref */, \ > - 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SS+8-RBP, \ > + 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SIZEOF_PTREGS-RBP, \ But I'd rather not see this one alone changed - either change all similar uses of SS, or leave the one here alone. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
