Marc, Jason already created a branch irqchip/gic-v2m, which I have created my patch against. So, what branch do you want me to re-create a patch against for you to review?
Suravee -----Original Message----- From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyng...@arm.com] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:12 AM To: Suthikulpanit, Suravee Cc: Mark Rutland; ja...@lakedaemon.net; Pawel Moll; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; t...@linutronix.de; Kasiviswanathan, Harish; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] irqchip: gic-v2m: Rework GICv2m Initialization Hi Suravee, On 09/08/14 00:17, suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com wrote: > From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com> > > This patch set reworks the GICv2m initialization based on Marc Zyngier > review comments. > > * Rebase to git://git.infradead.org/users/jcooper/linux.git > irqchip/gic-v2m > > Suravee Suthikulpanit (1): > irqchip/gic-v2m: Restructure the initalization code for v2m > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 37 +++++++-- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 115 > +++++++++----------------- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 30 +++---- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h | 10 +-- > 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-) > While I appreciate that you're trying to reduce the amount of stuff we review, it is actually much easier to look at the patch series as a whole, rather then as a diff against the previous version. Please squash this into your original series and repost it with a log of what has changed in the cover letter. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
