On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > NAK. There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :) > > Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the > lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem. > > Just being negative is not very constructive.
I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative suggestions. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
