On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 08:19:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > How about we simply assume 'idle' code, as defined by the rcu idle hooks > are safe? Why do we want to bend over backwards to cover this?
The thing is, we already have the special rcu trace hooks for tracing inside this rcu-idle section, so why go beyond this now?
pgpGDVQ1oHpC5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
