On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 18:26 -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > v1->v2: > - Remove patch 1 which changes preempt_enable() to > preempt_enable_no_resched(). > - Remove the RWSEM_READ_OWNED macro and assume readers own the lock > when owner is NULL. > - Reduce the spin threshold to 64.
So I still don't like this, and the fact that it is used in some virtualization locking bits doesn't really address the concerns about arbitrary logic in our general locking code. Also, why did you reduce it from 100 to 64? This very much wants to be commented. Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
