On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:46:24AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Here is a microcode/load_module error triggered by debug check commit
> 64c2181bc433b17f04da8fe8592aa83cceac9606 ("sched: Debug nested sleeps"):
>
> [main] Setsockopt(1 8 80d1000 4) on fd 21 [1:2:1]
> [main] Setsockopt(1 2f 80d1000 4) on fd 22 [4:2:60]
> [ 14.027148] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 14.027864] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 210 at kernel/sched/core.c:7088
> __might_sleep+0x40/0x68()
> [ 14.029295] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at
> [<c144e379>] prepare_to_wait+0x35/0x56
> [ 14.030590] Modules linked in:
> [ 14.031136] CPU: 0 PID: 210 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted
> 3.16.0-02167-g254135e #972
> [ 14.032263] 00000000 c0f4de4c c0f4de24 c196630c c0f4de3c c142f01a
> c1447632 c0f1dbb0
> [ 14.033480] 00000002 b0066140 c0f4de54 c142f057 00000009 c0f4de4c
> c1b3bac8 c0f4de68
> [ 14.034640] c0f4de88 c1447632 c1b3bb12 00001bb0 c1b3bac8 00000002
> c144e379 c144e379
> [ 14.035983] Call Trace:
> [ 14.036355] [<c196630c>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> [ 14.037005] [<c142f01a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x55/0x6c
> [ 14.037715] [<c1447632>] ? __might_sleep+0x40/0x68
> [ 14.038372] [<c142f057>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x26/0x2a
> [ 14.039097] [<c1447632>] __might_sleep+0x40/0x68
> [ 14.039787] [<c144e379>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x35/0x56
> [ 14.040595] [<c144e379>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x35/0x56
> [ 14.041272] [<c14a837e>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x39/0xb0
> [ 14.041934] [<c18fa2de>] ? __alloc_skb+0x3c/0x154
> [ 14.042572] [<c18fa2de>] __alloc_skb+0x3c/0x154
> [ 14.043339] [<c145117a>] ? mark_held_locks+0x44/0x60
> [ 14.044141] [<c1946093>] sigd_enq2+0x2a/0xff
> [ 14.044836] [<c1946188>] sigd_enq+0x20/0x2a
> [ 14.045405] [<c19467fb>] svc_listen+0x8b/0x11f
> [ 14.046009] [<c144e5a6>] ? __wake_up_sync+0xd/0xd
> [ 14.046653] [<c18f4132>] SyS_listen+0x37/0x51
> [ 14.047423] [<c18f4ce5>] SyS_socketcall+0x90/0x1c0
> [ 14.048328] [<c145136e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
> [ 14.049061] [<c19729f6>] ? restore_all+0xf/0xf
> [ 14.049665] [<c19729bd>] syscall_call+0x7/0x7
> [ 14.050253] [<c1970000>] ? __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x165/0x573
> [ 14.051147] ---[ end trace 6f1365c63eafedde ]---
> [main] Setsockopt(1 2d 80d1000 f0) on fd 25 [1:1:1]
---
Subject: atm: Fix blocking in wait loop
One should not call blocking primitives inside a wait loop, since both
require task_struct::state to sleep, so the inner will destroy the outer
state.
In this instance sigd_enq() will possible sleep for alloc_skb(), now if
I understand the code right, we do not actually need to call sigd_enq()
after the initial prepare_to_wait(), because we test the termination
condition before schedule() anyhow.
So we can simply move it up a bit and avoid the entire confusion.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
---
net/atm/svc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/atm/svc.c b/net/atm/svc.c
index d8e5d0c2ebbc..445ac238b69b 100644
--- a/net/atm/svc.c
+++ b/net/atm/svc.c
@@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ static int svc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
goto out;
}
set_bit(ATM_VF_WAITING, &vcc->flags);
- prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
sigd_enq(vcc, as_listen, NULL, NULL, &vcc->local);
+ prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
while (test_bit(ATM_VF_WAITING, &vcc->flags) && sigd) {
schedule();
prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
pgpYkiETHtjwB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
