Thierry,
在 2014年08月07日 21:14, Thierry Reding 写道:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 09:04:30PM +0800, caesar wrote:
[...]
As you say, I will rewrite the about if it's really need do so it.
For example:
static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v1 = {
.regs = {
.duty = 0x04,
.period = 0x08,
.cntr = 0x00,
.ctrl = 0x0c,
},
.prescaler = 2,
.set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1,
};
static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = {
.regs = {
.duty = 0x08,
.period = 0x04,
.cntr = 0x00,
.ctrl = 0x0c,
},
.prescaler = 1,
.set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
};
static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = {
.regs = {
.duty = 0x08,
.period = 0x04,
.cntr = 0x0c,
.ctrl = 0x00,
},
.prescaler = 1,
.set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
};
Is that right?
Yes.
+ .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
+};
No need for the double indirection.
Sorry, I think is need if you mean a double indirection for ".set_enable".
The "double indirection" was regarding the symbolic names for registers,
not the .set_enable(). Sorry.
OK,I will fix the about in patch v5 tomorrow if no other problems,Thanks!
Thierry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
