Hi Masami, This looks great. I'm a bit busy at the moment (just came back from vacation, and digging myself out of the hole that left me). But I definitely want this in. I have a bunch of tests too, that I can put on top of this. My tests are rather hacky, and hard code a lot of stuff in them, but they do test a bunch of features of ftrace. It shouldn't be too hard to include them here.
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 02:45:44 +0000 Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to introduce a collection of testcases for ftrace to > avoid regressions. > > For a long time, we've tried to stabilize and extend ftrace > tracing infrastructure. This small test framework is a kind of > stabilizing work for ftrace. For the first step, this series > just introduces a few basic testcases. However, it is easy to > add additional tests. I'd like to ask you, ftrace developers, > to add tests for your features to ensure it will not be broken > by future works. > > ftracetest is a tiny bash script so that anyone can easily > understand what it does. I think it is better to share and > discuss this tests before growing it. > > - Is it enough to support bash script? (of course you can > invoke other commands from the script) > - What's the good naming method of testcases? > - Is any dependency check required? > > BTW, I decided to put this under tools/testing/ftrace instead > of tools/testing/selftests/, because all tests requires root > privilege. It will be one of discussion points. Anyway, > it is easy to integrate this to the selftests. I agree. I think having its own directory is a good idea. Lets see what other people think. When I get time, I'll see if I can start a branch that pulls this in and start adding my own tests on top of it. Thanks! -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/