* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
> 

This patch looks dangerous and misleading to me.

> Time stamps are always implicitely enabled for record currently.  The
> old --time/-T option is a nop.
> 
> Allow the user to disable timestamps by using --no-time
> 
> This can cause some minor misaccounting (by missing mmaps), but
> significantly lowers the size of perf.data

I'm not any big change in size:

 -rw------- 1 mingo mingo 384768 Aug  5 08:01 perf.data.timestamps
 -rw------- 1 mingo mingo 336952 Aug  5 08:00 perf.data.notimestamps

That's a ~14% reduction - it's certainly noticeable but not 
earth-shattering.

And what is called 'minor misaccounting' in the description is 
actually a potentially broken profile that people might rely on.

So the patch description misleads twice: by exaggerating the 
advantages and also by downplaying the disadvantages.

So either remove the --time option altogether, or fix its 
'misaccounting' so that the profile can be relied on.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to