On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 12:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > I just ran this with PREEMPT_RT and it works fine. > > Not quite, and I will assume that some of the other patches I sent have > this same problem. The jbd_trylock_bh_state really scares me. It seems > that in fs/jbd/commit.c in journal_commit_transaction we have the > following code:
I am a bit confused, big surprise. Does this thread still have anything to do with this trace from my "Latency regressions" bug report? http://www.alsa-project.org/~rlrevell/2912us The problem only is apparent with PREEMPT_DESKTOP and "data=ordered". PREEMPT_RT has always worked perfectly. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/