This patch set improves upon the rwsem optimistic spinning patch set
from Davidlohr to enable better performing rwsem and more aggressive
use of optimistic spinning.

By using a microbenchmark running 1 million lock-unlock operations per
thread on a 4-socket 40-core Westmere-EX x86-64 test machine running
3.16-rc7 based kernels, the following table shows the execution times
with 2/10 threads running on different CPUs on the same socket where
load is the number of pause instructions in the critical section:

  lock/r:w ratio # of threads   Load:Execution Time (ms)
  -------------- ------------   ------------------------
  mutex               2         1:530.7, 5:406.0, 10:472.7
  mutex              10         1:1848 , 5:2046 , 10:4394

Before patch:
  rwsem/0:1           2         1:339.4, 5:368.9, 10:394.0
  rwsem/1:1           2         1:2915 , 5:2621 , 10:2764
  rwsem/10:1          2         1:891.2, 5:779.2, 10:827.2
  rwsem/0:1          10         1:5618 , 5:5722 , 10:5683
  rwsem/1:1          10         1:14562, 5:14561, 10:14770
  rwsem/10:1         10         1:5914 , 5:5971 , 10:5912

After patch:
  rwsem/0:1          2          1:161.1, 5:244.4, 10:271.4
  rwsem/1:1          2          1:188.8, 5:212.4, 10:312.9
  rwsem/10:1         2          1:168.8, 5:179.5, 10:209.8
  rwsem/0:1         10          1:1306 , 5:1733 , 10:1998
  rwsem/1:1         10          1:1512 , 5:1602 , 10:2093
  rwsem/10:1        10          1:1267 , 5:1458 , 10:2233

% Change:
  rwsem/0:1          2          1:-52.5%, 5:-33.7%, 10:-31.1%
  rwsem/1:1          2          1:-93.5%, 5:-91.9%, 10:-88.7%
  rwsem/10:1         2          1:-81.1%, 5:-77.0%, 10:-74.6%
  rwsem/0:1         10          1:-76.8%, 5:-69.7%, 10:-64.8%
  rwsem/1:1         10          1:-89.6%, 5:-89.0%, 10:-85.8%
  rwsem/10:1        10          1:-78.6%, 5:-75.6%, 10:-62.2%

It can be seen that there is dramatic reduction in the execution
times. The new rwsem is now even faster than mutex whether it is all
writers or a mixture of writers and readers.

Running the AIM7 benchmarks on the same 40-core system (HT off),
the performance improvements on some of the workloads were as follows:

      Workload       Before Patch       After Patch     % Change
      --------       ------------       -----------     --------
  custom (200-1000)     446135            477404         +7.0%
  custom (1100-2000)    449665            484734         +7.8%
  high_systime          152437            154217         +1.2%
   (200-1000)
  high_systime          269695            278942         +3.4%
   (1100-2000)

Waiman Long (7):
  locking/rwsem: don't resched at the end of optimistic spinning
  locking/rwsem: more aggressive use of optimistic spinning
  locking/rwsem: check for active writer/spinner before wakeup
  locking/rwsem: threshold limited spinning for active readers
  locking/rwsem: move down rwsem_down_read_failed function
  locking/rwsem: enables optimistic spinning for readers
  locking/rwsem: allow waiting writers to go back to optimistic spinning

 include/linux/osq_lock.h    |    5 +
 include/linux/rwsem.h       |    7 +
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c |  328 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 kernel/locking/rwsem.c      |   17 ++-
 4 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to