On 07/31, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> +void synchronize_rcu_tasks(void)
> +{
> +     /* Complain if the scheduler has not started.  */
> +     rcu_lockdep_assert(!rcu_scheduler_active,
> +                        "synchronize_rcu_tasks called too soon");
> +
> +     /* Wait for the grace period. */
> +     wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_tasks);
> +}

Btw, what about CONFIG_PREEMPT=n ?

I mean, can't synchronize_rcu_tasks() be synchronize_sched() in this
case?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to